Can I patent my idea?We guarantee you a Patent Pending Number. But thereafter, which options best protect your idea? Is your idea a new: AppAre you:
e.g. Creating an e‐commerce site (similar to amazon.com) to sell pet products within London only
e.g. Creating an Uber‐type platform for rickshaws / to transport food
Not patentable. Rather:
e.g. Data input, form generation and report output. We like to refer to this as "software merely doing "software stuff""
The idea is unlikely to be patentable. But, during development a "step" that is "new" and "not obvious to an expert" may be created, and this step may be patentable. To do:
e.g. A new method for compressing data
The idea is likely patentable. To do:
e.g. Sending a one‐time password communicated via a cellphone to login in to an online service (in combination with a "static" username and password)
The idea is likely patentable. To do:
Note: There must be an unexpected technical benefit associated with your new step. For instance, sending food / parcels via Uber achieves an "expected" technical benefit of transporting food / parcels. Physical productHave you:
e.g. Adding a plastic lining to the inside of a tin can to inhibit corrosion by saline contents.
If the "new feature" is not obvious to an expert in the field, it is likely patentable. To do:
e.g. Removing all the "buggy" electronics from Land Rovers.
Not patentable ‐ for patents, you must add a new feature. Rather:
e.g. Using a crayon as makeup to apply rouge to cheeks / eyeliner.
Not patentable ‐ only "new" and "not obvious" features you are adding to make the product suitable for this new purpose may be patented. To do:
e.g. Combining photocopier, scanner and facsimile machines into a single 3‐in‐1 office machine.
To be patentable, the combination must yield an unexpected technical benefit. For instance, merely providing a box containing a spanner and a screwdriver is not expected to be patentable. However, if the spanner is configured to connect and provide torque to the screwdriver, the benefit is unexpected and may be patentable. To do:
e.g. Making a bathtub out of aluminum.
If the new material is selected to provide the benefit normally associated with the material (e.g. corrosion resistance and light‐weight for aluminum), even if use of the material may be "new" worldwide, it will likely not be considered "not obvious to an expert". To do:
e.g. designing an extra small watering can for potted cacti.
Although making a product smaller may yield significant advantages, since you are not adding a "new" and "not obvious" feature", varying the size of products / making them more compact is typically not patentable. We suggest:
e.g. a 6‐piece fishing rod.
Merely making a product modular is unlikely to be considered patentable. However, if the connector you design to connect the modules is "new" and "not obvious", the connector may be patented. Then, incorporating the patentable connector with the modules will result in your modules "piggy‐backing" into the patent. We suggest:
Business methodDo you have a new:
e.g. A new Turkish restaurant outside Piccadilly Station, a bookkeeping firm focusing on small e‐commerce businesses.
Not patentable. Rather:
e.g. A dental insurance policy for cats, a life policy that pays out in Bitcoin
Not patentable. Rather:
e.g. A retailer that tracks customers' spending habits to tailor its marketing.
If the method includes a "new" and "not obvious" step, the method may be patentable. To do:
MethodDoes your method include:
e.g. Sending all couriered parcels to a central hub before transporting them to their destinations.
If the step is "new" and "not obvious", the method may be patentable. To do:
e.g. Deep frying chicken at 15 psi and at 250 degrees F to prevent vaporization of water (i.e. the patented KFC cooking process)
Note: The range extremities cannot be arbitrary. A technical effect must occur at both ends of the range. If the range is "new" and "not obvious" (i.e. yields an unexpected technical effect), the method may be patentable. To do:
Chemical composition / formulationDoes your composition include:
e.g. A composition including 10% vitamin E, 10% lavender oil, 15% Argon oil and 65% aqueous cream
A novel combination of known constituents that are selected to provide the benefits ordinarily associated with the constituents, is typically not patentable. Rather:
e.g. a shampoo including a combination of Penthenol and Panthenyl Ethyl Ether (i.e. Pro‐V)
New actives can be patented. To do:
GameDo you have:
e.g. Poker, Canasta
Methods of playing a game are typically not patentable. Consider:
e.g. Monopoly game board with playing pieces
Game boards can be protected in various ways. We suggest:
Formula
e.g. E=MC^2
Formulae / mathematical calculations are generally not patentable. Rather:
Patents can be enforced to prevent others from copying your product / service. Patent Pending Numbers are also useful to keep competitors at arm’s length and give you room to grow. As for marketing, marking your product / service "Patent Pending" is invaluable ‐ it communicates your technological advantage over competitors. |
Like our page on facebook: